Navigation

Article

EFFECT OF ADAPTIVE PHYSICAL CULTURE AGENTS ON PSYCHOMOTOR AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES IN CHILDREN WITH ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER (0.27 Mb, pdf) Read
Authors:
Shvets Regina Rinatovna
Rumyantseva Elvira Rimovna
Annotation:

The research purpose was to determine the influence of the use of elements of sensory integration in the correctional process of children with attention deficit disorder.

Methods and organization of the research. The study involved 16 senior preschool children aged 5-7 years, who were divided into control and main groups. During the experiment, the influence of the modified method on the indicators of static and dynamic coordination, differentiation of movements of the fingers, visual-motor coordination, as well as on cognitive processes, such as concentration of attention and the amount of short-term memory, was assessed.

Research results and their discussion. As a result of the pedagogical experiment, significant positive changes were revealed in terms of indicators assessing psychomotor and cognitive processes. Thus, the indicators of static coordination in children of the main group (before – 38,1±2,9 sec., after – 53,2±3,1 sec.) are significantly better than the control (before – 37,5±3,4 sec., after – 45,1±2,9 sec.) by 17,9%. Dynamic coordination indicators in the main group (before – 18,9±2,1 sec., after – 13,5±2,8 sec.) are significantly better than the control one (before – 19,5±2,7 sec., after – 16,5±2,9 sec.) by 22,2%. Indicators of differentiation of finger movements in child­ren of the main group (before – 2,9±1,8, after – 4,9±2,4 points) are significantly better than the control group (before – 2,8±1,9, after – 3,5±1,4 points) by 8,1%. Cognitive processes: concentration of attention in children of the main group (before – 3,7±2,1 min., after – 1,7±1,9 min.) is significantly better than the control group (before – 3,5±1,4 min., after – 3,1±2,4 min.) by 45,1%, the amount of short-term memory in the main group (before – 4,7±1,8, after – 6,9±1,1 number of words) is significantly better than the control one (before – 4,75±0,8, after – 6,1±0,9 number of words) by 13,1%.

Conclusion. A comparative analysis of the results obtained showed that the use of elements of sensory integration in the process of correctional work with children of older preschool age with attention deficit disorder has a positive effect on their psychomotor qualities and cognitive processes.

Bibliography:
  • Ayres, E. J. Child and sensory integration. Understanding hidden development problems. Translated from English by Julia Dare / E. J. Ayres. – M.: Terevinf, 2018. – 272 p.
  • Glozman, J. M. Neuropsychology of childhood / J. M. Glozman. – M.: Academy, 2009. – 268 p.
  • Kasmakova L.E., Berezina A.V., Kolyasova V.N. Logorhythmics and art pedagogical technologies in the development and correction of coordination abilities of preschoolers with severe speech disorders. Science and sport: current trends., 2023, vol. 11, no.1, pp. 128-135 (in Russ.).
  • Kasmakova T.A. The use of the sensory-dynamic hall “Оwl house” in the development of mental and physical qualities in children with autism spectrum disorder. Science and sport: current trends, 2022, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 137-146 (in Russ.).
  • Luria, A. R. Fundamentals of neuropsychology / A. R. Luria. – M.: Peter, 2023. – 381 p.
  • Machinskaya, R. I. Interdisciplinary approach to the study and differentiation of ADHD variants in primary school children / R. I. Machinskaya, E. V. Krupskaya // Bulletin of the Pomeranian University, 2017, No. 2(8), pp.101-121 (in Russ.).
  • Mikadze, Yu. V. Neuropsychology of childhood / Yu. V. Mikadze. – M.: Peter, 2018. – 288 p.
  • Minenkova, I. N. Providing sensory integration in correctional and developmental work with children with severe and/or multiple disorders of psychophysical development / I. N. Minenkova. Minsk: 2017. – 180 p.
  • Practical neuropsychology. Working experience with children with learning difficulties / under the general ed. of J. M., Glozman. – 2nd ed. – M.: Genesis, 2016. – 334 p.
  • Shvets, R.R. Features of correctional and developmental activities for children with disabilities/R.R. Shvets, N.Y. Tokmakova // Proceedings of Tula State University. Physical education. Sport, 2023, No. 1, pp. 55-61 (in Russ.).
  • Swanson, JM, Kinsbourne, M, Nigg, J, Lanphear B, Stefanatos GA, Volkow N, Taylor E, Casey BJ, Castellanos FX, Wadhwa PD. Etiologic subtypes of attention–deficit/hyperactivity disorder: brain imaging, molecular genetic and environmental factors and the dopamine hypothesis. Neuropsychol Rev. 2, 2007, on 17(1), pp. 39-59.
  • Kinsbourne, M. Genetic and biochemistry in attention deficit disorder / M. Kinsbourne, C. K. Deutsch // Developmental psychopathology, ed. by M. Lewis, S. Miller. – N.Y.: Plenum Press, 1990, pp. 93–107.
  • Marzocchi, G. M. What are the causes of the attention deficits observed in children with dyslexia / G. M. Marzocchi, S. Ornaghi, S. Barboglio // Child neuropsychology. 2009, on 15, pp. 567-581.
  • Shalev, L. Computerized Progressive attentional training (CPAT) program: effective direct intervention for children with ADHD / L. Shalev, Ye. Tsal, C. Mevorach // Child Neuropsychology. 2007, on. 13(4), pp. 382-388.
  • Weinstein, C. S. Description of mothers with ADHD with children with ADHD / C. S. Weinstein, R. J. Apfel, S. R. Weinstein // Psychiatry. 1998, on. 61(1), pp. 9-12.